Lockes Doctrine of Abstraction Essay Example for Free

Lockes Doctrine of Abstraction EssayJohn Locke and George Berkeley be two famous philosophers whose work inst totally(a) similarities in their proximity of publication, further stark differences in their beliefs. In Lockes Essay Concerning Human Understanding, he argued passionately for his doctrine of rob cerebrations. On the other hand, Berkeley, in his work, Principles of Human Knowledge, he made all(prenominal) effort to reject all of Lockes claims. Although viciously attacked by Berkeley, Lockes doctrine of pussyfootion holds squ ar as a fundamentally sound and practical doctrine for the advancement of knowledge and communication. In contain II of Essay, Locke engineerulates theories on how knowledge is acquired. Previously in Essay, Locke establishes his position as an empiricist with his discussion of simplistic and complex ideas. According to Locke, saucer-eyed ideas come into the discernment either through sensation or through reflection. With regards to co mplex ideas, Locke argues that, although the wit is a blank slate until impressed upon by experience, he acknowledges the power of the mind to be multifaceted. The acts of the mind, wherein it exerts its power over fair ideas, are chiefly these three 1. Combining several simple ideas into superstar compound one, and thus all complex ideas are made. 2.The second is bringing two ideas, whether simple or complex, together, and setting them by one a nonher so as to take a visual sense of them at once, without uniting them into one, by which it gets all its ideas of relations. 3. The third is separating them from all other ideas that accompany them in their certain existence this is called generalization, and thus all its general ideas are made. (Essay 146) This world so, it is apparent that Locke believes in the minds capacity to manipulate content as it is received.Locke entertains this idea by exempting that the mind subjects simple ideas to various processes such as combin ing, comparing, and generalization. The most important of these three abilities is the minds ability to institute abstract ideas. farther into Book III of Essay, Locke outlines his famous doctrine of generalization, or instead, doctrine of general wrong. Abstract ideas are form by proceeding with especial(a) ideas (which may either be simple and complex). As established earlier, abstract ideas are a result of the minds ability to manipulate. Locke further demonstrates this point by explaining that sole(prenominal) particular things exist in the external world and can be determined by the senses.The physical composition of abstract ideas is reliant on the existence of particular ideas and is therefrom derivative of them. General or abstract terms come to fruition as the result of subtracting away particular qualities such as color, height, weight, and size from an idea. however , at the homogeneous time, maintaining the general or similar qualities that allow the idea to b e diametric or grouped with others. Locke illustrates this point in his discussion of general terms. For example, a particular idea would be, as Locke states, Peter, James or Mary.Through the process of abstraction, one subtracts the qualities that are specific to Peter, James, or Mary, and instead hold up the characteristics which are greens to all three. Thus, the abstract or general term derived from the three, is human existences. (Essay 396) According to Locke the absence seizure of the specific qualities and preservation of similarities is what makes the idea general or relat commensurate to others. Thus forming the process of abstraction, a doctrine that is embraced by Locke, just now wholeheartedly rejected by Berkeley. One aspect of George Berkeley that is safe to assume is that he was definitely non a fan of Locke, or Lockes doctrine of abstraction.This is evident in the sheer feature that Berkeley devoted his introduction of Principles to the refutation of the doc trine of abstraction. However this raises the question Why did Berkeley feel so powerfully? Why does Berkeley feel the need to reject abstraction? The answer to these questions is two-fold. First and foremost, Berkeley sees Lockes doctrine of abstraction as a detractor from the overall purpose of his philosophical work.Philosophy being nothing else still the study of wisdom and truth.. a greater clearness and evidence of knowledge, and be less disturbed by with the doubts and difficulties of other men. just so it is, we see the illiterate bulk of mankind walk the high-road of plain common sense. (PHK intro 1) In this example Berkeley establishes himself as the no nonsense defender of common sense . passim Principles, Berkeley often mentions his disdain for simply verbal philosophical questions that are ultimately speculative and accomplish nothing.By disproving abstraction, he can avoid what he believes to be useless philosophy. Instead, Berkeley presents himself to be rooted mo re so in specifics and what can be cognize. An example of this exists in his discussion of mathematics, arithmetic and the lifelike sciences and abstraction. In this discussion, Berkeley argues that abstraction plays no part in these concepts. (PHK 118-122) Building on this, abstraction withal threatens Berkeleys overarching theme of esse este percepi, Or rather to be is to be perceived. Throughout Principles, Berkeley essentially argues that specific qualities such as color, size, and odor cannot exist unless they are perceived.By this logic, abstract ideas, ideas born absent of perception and stripped of specific qualities, cannot adequately fit into the constraints of hisrequirement for existence. This being so, Berkeley openly objects to and attacks Lockes doctrine. Despite this effort, Berkeley is unable to accomplish his intended goal. In his introduction, Berkeley launches a three divided attack against Lockes abstractionism. Beginning with the inability to abstract argu ment, followed by the inconsistent and confusing and ending with supererogatory argument, Berkeley outlines what he believes to be a killing blow to Lockes doctrine. However, his rejection of abstraction is rather weak.As utter before, Berkeley begins his rejection of abstraction by stating that the human mind is unable to abstract. He illustrates his point through a thought process experiment, I can consider the hand, the eye, the nose, each by itself abstracted or separated from the rest of the body. but then whatever hand or eye I imagine, it must have some particular shape and color I cannot by any effort of thought conceive the abstract idea above described. And it is insufferable for me to form the abstract idea of motion distinct from the body moving. (PHK intro 10) In this example, Berkeley demonstrates his attempt to form a general idea through the process of abstraction.He concludes that the human mind is unable to accomplish this as it is impossible not to attribute specific and particular qualities to an idea when abstracting it. This being so, when imaging an idea, one cannot escort it in general terms, but instead can only view it particularly. This argument doesnt really develop any strengths or weakness for or against Abstraction. If posed with the same thought experiment, Locke would surely answer that he would be able to form abstract ideas within his mind.Because Locke believes all human minds have the same capabilities, Locke would argue that because he is able to form abstract ideas, Berkeley must also be able to do so, thus rendering the point moot. Berkeley moves on from the psychological inability to form abstract thoughts and onto the argument that the abstraction is inconsistent and therefore inadequate as a doctrine. Holding screen no punches, Berkeley directly quotes Locke in his introduction to Principles. . . does it not require some pains and skill to form the general idea of a triangle . . . for it must be neither obliqu e, nor rectangle, neither equilateral, equicrural, no scalenon, but all and none of these at once. (Essay 596)Berkeley is quick to respond to this statement. In effect, it is something imperfect that cannot exist, an idea wherein some move of several different and inconsistent ideas are put together. (PHK intro 13) In this example, Berkeley criticizes Lockes doctrine as not only being impossible to achieve, but also inconsistent. In his reading of Locke, Berkeley states that Lockes description of the abstraction process as adopting all and none. Berkeley outlines the contradiction that object or idea cannot posses both all and none of the same qualities.Because there exists a contradiction within Lockes argument, Berkeley asserts, that the doctrine of abstraction is flawed and therefore impossible. However, it is in this example it becomes apparent that Berkeley mis-interprets Lockes doctrine. Perhaps in angst to defeat abstraction, Berkeley gets tripped up on Lockes wording. Ab straction only deals with the subtraction of the differences, but keeps the commonalities between ideas. In fact, it appears that Berkeley is the more inconsistent of the two as he accurately describes Lockes accredited position on abstraction earlier in the intro, yet discounts it later on. (PHK intro 9).The third and final argument against abstraction Berkeley outlines is the questioning of the necessity for abstraction. Berkeley argues, from all which the natural consequence should seem to be, that so difficult a thing as the as the forming abstract ideas was not necessary for communication, which is so flaccid and familiar to all sorts of men. But we are told, if they seem obvious and easy to grown men. it is only because by constant and familiar use they are made so. (PHK intro 14) In this example, Berkeley states that general are utterly useless because they fail to appropriately define an idea.Instead, generalizations are adopted because theyre easy and familiar, not becau se they are useful. Furthermore, according to Locke, the meaning of a general term is an abstract idea. Berkeley refutes this notion and explains that a general term denotes a range of particular ideas. As a result, Berkeley explains that abstraction is not only useless, but also confusing. Again, Berkeley refers to triangles in his description. How can we know any proposition to be true of all particular triangles, except we have first seen it demonstrated of the abstract idea of a triangle which equally agrees to all?For, because a property may be demonstrated to agree to some one particular triangle, it will not thence follow that it equally belongs to any other triangle. (PHK intro 16) In this example, Berkeley demonstrates that abstracted general terms lead to confusion. The abstract term for a triangle cannot adequately encompass the idea of a triangle because it can be attributed to a wide range of triangles. (Right, obtuse, acute and so on ) By using abstraction, Berkeley argues, one could be referring to a range of particular ideas without properly defining one. exclusively using the general term triangle does not appropriately account for a triangle because it is impossible tou nderstand exactly what triangle is being talked about. Because of this, Berkeley argues, the lack of specificity in abstract terms allows for confusion which hinders human ontogeny of knowledge. While Berkeley has his moments, ultimately, Locke appears to be the more philosophically sound of the two. This is mainly because of the the application of the doctrine of abstraction and its ability to enhance human knowledge and communication.In Book III Locke notes the importance of abstract general ideas to knowledge. He explains that abstract ideas and sort are of central importance to a common understanding and communication of language. dustup ultimately derived from such as signify apprised ideas. It may also lead us a little towards the original notions how great a depen dence our words have on common sensible ideas. (Essay 388) In this example, Locke explains the purpose of abstraction. With the ability to attach commonly held and general terms to ideas, people are able better communicate ideas to each other because they hold a common understanding.For example if one try to explain the qualities of a cat, imagine how tedious it would be under Berkeleys system of particulars for one to explain every perceivable quality of a cat. In Lockes system, however, ideas can be abstracted and it is commonly known that cats are felines, walk on 4 legs, and are mammals. When someone uses the general term cat others are able to recognize the term and know what is being discussed without further and unnecessary explanation.The ability to make this classification helps the growth of knowledge because it allows all to hold a commonly known concept. Qualities of size, color, etc are irrelevant. General terms attach an efficiency, and the ability for all to understa nd.